Analysis of President Andrew Jackson’s Vision for America
I agree with President Jackson’s support for the Indian removal policy. In his message, he indicated that the monetary preferences which it guarantees to the Government are the least of its proposals. The reason I support the Act is that it puts a conclusion to all conceivable peril of impact between the specialists of the General and State Governments under the Indians. It will put a thick and edified populace in huge tracts of a nation now involved by a couple of savage trackers (Jackson 2). President Jackson defended the policy and indicated that by opening the entire domain between Tennessee on the north and Louisiana on the south to the settlement of the whites, it will limitlessly reinforce the southwestern wilderness and render the nearby States sufficiently able to repulse future attacks without a remote guide. Besides, it will ease the entire State of Mississippi and the western piece of Alabama of Indian inhabitance, and empower those States to progress quickly in populace, riches, furthermore, control.
I concur with President Jackson’s of the assessment of the U.S bank’s mistakes and its supporters. In his message to the Senate, President Jackson pointed out that a bank of the United States is in numerous regards advantageous for the Government and valuable to the general population. He added that he genuinely lamented that in the demonstration before him, he could see none alterations of the bank contract which were vital, in his sentiment, to make it perfect with equity, with sound strategy, or with the Constitution of our nation (Jackson 4). I agree with his comments because the present corporate body designated the president, executives, and friends of the Bank of the United States will have existed at the time this demonstration is planned to produce results twenty years. It appreciates a select benefit of banking under the specialist of the General Government, an imposing business model of its support and support, and, as an essential result, right around an imposing business model of the remote and local trade.
President Jackson’s opposition on South Carolina’s efforts at abolishing federal laws is persuasive. This is because he uses logic to make his arguments. For instance, he indicated in his speech that on the off chance that South Carolina considers the income laws unlawful, and has a privilege to counteract their execution in the port of Charleston, there would be an unmistakable sacred issue with their gathering in each other port, and no income could be gathered anyplace; for all imposts must be equivalent (Jackson 22). He added that it was no response to rehash that an illegal law is no law, inasmuch as the topic of its legitimateness is to be chosen by the State itself, for each law working harmfully upon any neighborhood intrigue will be maybe thought, and absolutely spoke to, as unlawful, and, as has been appeared, there is no intrigue. From his arguments, he is persuasive in the sense that he provides the effects that would result if the federal laws were to be nullified.
After reading his speech, it is clear that President Jackson was passionate and strong-willed. For instance, he supported the removal of the Indians since he wanted the Americans to benefit more from the nation’s riches. President Trump might try to model himself after President Jackson by emulating his strong-willed character and being passionate for America. This is especially because Trump strongly supports and is strict about the immigration policy which will ensure that the American citizens have the most opportunities. The main danger for linking President Trump’s administration with that of President Jackson is that the party ideologies would clash. This is because Trump is a Republican while Jackson was a Democratic-Republican.
Jackson, Andrew. “A Series of Primary Documents Pertaining To Andrew Jackson and His Vision for America.”