Module 3: Hospital III: Structures with Functions
A mock survey is an essential tool in healthcare. Typically, it is carried out by healthcare agencies to ensure that care systems, procedures, and processes of care are stable. In other words, through a mock survey, risks in structures and functions in health facilities are identified for the corrective measure to be taken.
Home therapeutic care is a profoundly managed industry, whose rules and regulations keep on changing. As such it is vital for an agency to make prior arrangements and practice for compliance purposes before an auditor shows up surprisingly at your doorstep (Cutler, Conley & Kohlbacher, 2013). A mock survey is a core instrument that all home medicinal services organizations should utilize.
A mock survey offers a chance for an agency to perform fresh investigations at frameworks, strategies and procedures of care and distinguish possible zones that might be in danger. The in-danger areas can elevate into severe issues that may have legal consequences. A mock survey may also be intended to uncover how staff will deal with difficult conditions (Cutler, Conley & Kohlbacher, 2013). Moreover, amid a mock survey, one may find that completing a specific methodology in the manner which it has always been performed may never be satisfactory.
To carry out a mock survey in the rightful manner, multiple records and systems should be pursued. At the initial stage of the investigation, records are basic. They include those that contain unduplicated patients for the earlier year time frame. The lists of active and discharged patients are also key (Shaw, Wilson & Brown, 2016). The records should be effortlessly available and updated based on the essential analyses and disciplines where possible.
A couple of steps may be followed to get ready for a mock study. To start with, audit your past regulatory overviews. They include those performed by the state, CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid) or other authorizing bodies, for example, the Accreditation Commission for Health Care (ACHC), the Community Health Accreditation Program (CHAP) and The Joint Commission (TJC) (Shaw, Wilson & Brown, 2016). Close consideration ought to be paid to the findings of one’s past reviews. In the event that any inadequacies occurred, one should ensure that the correction plan is still functional so as to avoid the reoccurrence of mistakes. Moreover, it is vital to audit your QI (quality improvement) program. It can involve assessing the OBQI (Outcome-Based Quality Improvement) report, conceivably avoidable occasions, and process strategies from the CASPER framework.
Numerous different reports are also important for a mock overview. Initially, an audit of the authoritative approach and methodology manuals and the clinical strategy manual should be conducted (Seavey, 2015). Surveyors regularly request explicit approaches and clinical methodology when they use home visit systems and strategies that are not standard and inconsistent. As such, one should act similarly during a mock survey.
Besides, the past state study or accreditation reports, alongside any inadequacies and activity designs, are important to survey. It is important to guarantee the deficiencies will not be reccur, and the activity designs are being implemented. If they fail to comply, they could prompt condition level insufficiencies and potential sanctions, so this is extremely important. Above all, home visits are an essential part of mock surveys. To sufficiently get ready for them, roughly a similar number of home visits ought to be led as a surveyor would perform (Seavey, 2015). The home visits should be based on matters associated with multiple issues, for example, wounds, multi-disciplinary, treatment just, IV, and assistant administrations. Every clinical record should be explored before any visit. Additionally, before the visit happens, the clinician’s vehicle set up and supplies ought to be assessed.
Cutler, A., Conley, L., & Kohlbacher, D. (2013). Tracing accountability. Nursing management, 44(12), 16-19.
Seavey, R. E. (2015). Sterile processing accreditation surveys: risk reduction and process improvement. AORN Journal, 102(4), 358-368.
Shaw, K. A., Wilson, K. D., & Brown, J. E. (2016). Hospital incident command system: a tool for a TJC accreditation survey. Journal of healthcare protection management: a publication of the International Association for Hospital Security, 32(1), 63-70.